This is Beyond Science!

Modern internationally standardised science is just one way to see the world, there are other ways to see the world and you can see the world in your own way given you focus on the truth. Truth can be seen and told in different ways. You see the 19^th and early 20^th century scientific works and you realise that science back then had aesthetics. I’d suggest you read psychological works of William James to find out. Science, and even mathematics had soul back then and it was not soulless and “modernised” like it is today. If the end goal was totalitarianism, educating people was a big mistake for those who run the world, but then the financial cycle of the world too must keep running which needs people having education, the rest of people can be deluded or prevented from having knowledge by other methods. I prefer 19^th and early 20^th century approach to science and mathematics; it makes me feel kind of steampunk. Aesthetics change, like how mobile phones from Nokia’s creative designs have ended up becoming all the same and same with their GUIs. Trust me, you might not know it yet, but the times have not become better, back in the days you could actually defend yourselves, now even self-defence is not an option. You are the fodder that is shovelled in the big machine to keep it moving. I like modern standardised science, you can see how cool it looks when you see labs in Hollywood, like the lab in Morbius or so many other movies. I prefer old, steampunk kind of 19^th and early 20^th century science which used to have warmth. The warmth actually was in people, but it carried forward into the science they did. You can also see how India used to do science. Our science was done in Sanskrit. It was our standardised way of doing science. We used to do math, medicine astronomy and so many other things in Sanskrit. The truth remained the same, the facts remained the same but the way it felt, changed. So I guess you get my drift, science can approach with all its truths and facts in ways that is different from the modern internationally standardised science. It’s kind of like changing the language of science and it changes the aesthetics of the science while keeping the facts and the truths same. Standardisation is necessary for science to be able to make science convenient. Like if someone names a gene HLA B27 it becomes an entity with a name and a person who studies it later might study and take it from there finding new things about the gene and further naming things he finds, it’s all about extending frontiers, but if you study people who are uneducated you see as many approaches to science as there are people, they make their conclusions according to their repeated experiences which proves something to them as facts, it is an empirical method and its linguistics might be different but it is in fact science and like standardised science works on saving the knowledge until now in scientific papers, this knowledge gets saved in the experiences and is conveyed to other people and next generation by the method of communication such as speech. This is how humanity and science in humanity evolved. The recipe that only your grandmother used to make in the whole wide world is now made by your mother and you too have learnt it. We live in times when even standard science can’t be trusted anymore. There are millions of bogus papers being published and especially in countries like India and when even scientific papers can’t be trusted you have to understand that situation is actually dire. Though good thing is that those who really control the things in the world have access to the truth and also accurate science, but it is out of reach of common people so the only option we have is to empirically confirm even scientific papers.